 |
 |
Our Greatest Apologetic
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
November 17, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
I
teach apologetics formally. Apologetics is the “defense”
of the Christian faith against anti-Christian ideas. The late Francis
Schaeffer was a great evangelical apologist who once said that the
greatest apologetic for evangelism was the oneness of Christians.
He also said that our truest identifying mark is love, thus when we
love one another the world will observe this love and hear our
message. I tell all my students, “Schaeffer was right. Now what
will we do with this challenge and how does this work?”
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Why Does It Matter If We Pursue Unity?
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
November 10, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
I
have argued that relational unity is the central point of
Jesus’ prayer in John 17:20–23 But why is this so
important? In the prayer Jesus plainly says that his mission hangs
upon our becoming the corporate answer to his prayer. The mission of
Christ is so closely linked with the church relationally that
the world will not understand and experience God’s love
until we are “brought” to experience this unity.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
The Unity Jesus Actually Prays for in John 17
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
November 3, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
We
saw last week how badly some have misinterpreted John 17:20–23
in their attempts to make this prayer fit with the present realty of
the divided church. Even many local congregations have used this kind
of interpretive approach to justify their continual divisions and
arguments. The question we need to ask now is what does this text
really mean, positively?
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
The Jesus Prayer for Christian Unity
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
October 27, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
The
prayer Jesus offers in John 17 is that he will be specifically
glorified in his impending death and resurrection. He further prays
for his immediate disciples who will be commissioned to carry on his
work. His words to them are deeply moving. This prayer, if considered
in a strictly biblical sense, is “The Lord’s Prayer.”
It is a prayer that only our Lord could offer to the Father,
not one that we could ever pray as a model. And it is the
longest and most sweeping recorded prayer Jesus ever prayed.
But note carefully that Jesus doesn’t pray for his immediate
disciples only but for entire church; i.e., for all of those
who will believe in him throughout all the ages to follow. He prays
that all believers “may be one as we [Father and Son]
are one.”
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
How a Deeply Conservative Christian Discovered the Catholic Church
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
October 13, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
Seventeen
years ago I completed a twenty-one year pastoral ministry and began
the work of ACT 3 (formerly known as Reformation & Revival
Ministries), a ministry of mission and renewal to the whole church.
This new work has been my God-called ministry ever since. During the
last two years of my pastoral experience I began to preach through
the Gospel of John. I never finished the entire Fourth Gospel, to my
consternation. But it has since seemed more significant to me that I
finished my expositions of John with the words of Jesus in John
17:20-26.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
A Portrait of Christian Unity
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
October 6, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
Beginning
around the middle of the first century the nascent Christian church
found itself involved in open disunity. Paul’s Corinthian
letters in the New Testament bear ample witness to the truth of my
statement.
I
appeal to you, brothers and sisters, in the name of our Lord Jesus
Christ, that all of you agree with one another in what you say and
that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly
united in mind and thought (1 Corinthians 1:10).
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Questions & Answers: Part Three
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
September 29, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
This
is the last installment in a three-part series answering common
questions addressed to me about the mission of ACT 3. These three
articles provide me with a bridge to the subject of church
unity which I will take up next week in a new ACT 3 Weekly series.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Questions & Answers: Part Two
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
September 22, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
Last
week I began a three-part series answering common questions addressed
to me about the mission of ACT 3. I am using these three articles as
a bridge to the subject of church unity which I will take up
next in the ACT 3 Weekly series. These forthcoming articles will
share some of the work I have done in writing my forthcoming book:
Your Church Is Too Small.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Questions & Answers: Part One
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
September 15, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
I
am asked a lot of questions in the course of my ministry. The next
several weeks I will do a question and answer series that provides a
response to some of the most commonly asked questions that I receive
about ACT 3 and my ministry. Since I just completed a long summer
series on the Trinity, and will soon launch a mini-series on the
unity of the church, I would like to use the articles over the next
few weeks as a bridge to the things that I will write for the
ACT 3 Weekly in coming months
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Can We Recover the Doctrine of the Trinity in Our Mission?
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
September 8, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
In
this final article, in my extended summer series on the Trinity, I
want to end where all good theology should always end—with the
mission of Christ in this world. I am committed to making the
missional mandate of Christ central to the renewal of the Church in
the new millennium. I am convinced that no doctrine can more
adequately help us restore the mission of Christ to its proper place
than the doctrine of God and thus, in particular, the doctrine of the
Trinity.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Can We Recover the Doctrine of the Trinity in Our Experience? Part 6
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
September 1, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
When
we begin to consider the truth of the Trinity seriously we have
questions about prayer as well as worship. How should the doctrine of
the Trinity affect our experience of God in prayer? We turn to this
question as we further consider what this vital truth means for the
Church catholic.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Can We Recover the Doctrine of the Trinity in Our Experience? Part 5
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
August 25, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
We
have considered how and why we should take the Trinity seriously over
the months of this summer. In the last few weeks I have sought to
show how we can recover the doctrine of the Trinity in our practical
Christian experience. This is not a doctrine for scholars to debate
but a truth that feeds and nourishes the soul of the Church and each
believer personally. This has been my purpose—to show how this
truth can and does feed the human soul at the deepest levels.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Can We Recover the Doctrine of the Trinity in Our Experience? Part 4
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
August 18, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
Perhaps
the most pressing personal question we face at the beginning of the
new millennium is: “What does it mean to be a human person?”
Scientists and social scientists work from every angle seeking to
give Western people a reason to have meaning and purpose. I suggest
the recovery of the doctrine of the Trinity, in our human
consciousness and experience, is the only meaningful answer to our
quest.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Can We Recover the Doctrine of the Trinity in Our Experience? Part 3
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
August 11, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
Non-Christians
often seek to understand the doctrine of the Trinity and find it
totally incomprehensible. The famous American, Thomas Jefferson, was
one such person. He called the Trinity “incomprehensible
jargon.” The medieval Catholic theologian, Thomas Aquinas,
would have agreed with Jefferson, but he would have also said that
which is “incomprehensible” is “not
unintelligible.”
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Can We Recover the Doctrine of the Trinity in Our Experience? Part 2
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
August 4, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
Theologian
Charles Lowry has called the doctrine of the Trinity “the most
comprehensive and the most nearly all-inclusive formulation of the
truth of Christianity” (“What Is the Doctrine of the
Trinity,” in Millard J. Erickson, ed., The Living God,
Vancouver: Regent College Reprint, 1973, 419). I believe the doctrine
lies at the heart of the Great Commission in Matthew 28 and thus it
is vital to the true mission of Christ’s Church. I also believe
that Karl Barth was correct when he said “Father, Son and Holy
Spirit” is rightly the “Christian name” of God
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Can We Recover the Doctrine of the Trinity in Our Experience? Part 1
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
July 28, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
In
five previous articles we have surveyed the importance and
development of the doctrine of the Trinity in the history of the
Christian Church. I have maintained that modern Protestant Christians
pay way too little attention to this central Christian truth. Whether
it is out of sheer ignorance, or from a dismissive assumption that we
already know this truth, it does not really matter if we are not
committed to the confession of, and our personal and corporate
experience of, the divine Trinity. Our preaching, prayer life,
worship and music all reflect the virtual absence of Trinitarianism,
in both our private lives and in our church practice. The results are
serious. So how do we get this truth back and then begin to take it
very seriously in our Christian experience?
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Rightly Recognizing God as Trinity, Part 4
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
July 21, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
On
a Sunday, during the era of the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther
entered his pulpit to preach on the doctrine of the Trinity and said:
This
article is so far above the power of the human mind to grasp, or the
tongue to express, that God, as Father of his children, will pardon
us when we stammer and lisp as best we can, if only our faith be pure
and right (cited by Lloyd A. Arnett, Taking the Trinity Seriously
(in the Anglican Agenda Series, published by Anglican Essentials,
Milton, Ontario, Canada, 2007).
No
doctrine, as we have already seen, is more profound than that of the
Trinity. And no doctrine is more important to the life and health of
orthodox Christian faith and practice. Luther gets it right. The
human mind cannot grasp it and the tongue cannot adequately express
it. I had a professor who once said, “If you try to figure this
doctrine out you will lose your mind, but it you deny it you will
lose your soul.” Surely this is the article of faith, the
article by which true Christians will stand or fall.
Before
we turn our attention, in several forthcoming ACT 3 Weekly
articles, to the practical benefits of a robust doctrine of the
Trinity I want to offer a final reflection upon the truth of the
Trinity itself.
We
have looked at the East, and thus to the contributions of the
Cappadocian Fathers. Now we look at Augustine and the West.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Rightly Recognizing God as Trinity, Part 3
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
July 14, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
Too
much of American Christianity has been reduced to slogans about Jesus
that can be placed on bumper stickers and billboards. To some extent
this is the result of marketing the Christian faith in popular
culture. I am more concerned with the loss of the doctrine of God
which is behind this marketing. We have a doctrine of God that is
both distorted and undeveloped.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Rightly Recognizing God as Trinity, Part 2
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
July 7, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
By
the early fourth century a number of the important issues surrounding
the doctrine of the Trinity came into much clearer focus. A very
popular leader by the name of Arius became a star in northern Egypt,
at one of the most important centers of early Christianity. His claim
was straightforward and clear. He believed that there was only one
eternal, invisible God. As a consequence Arius argued that Jesus
Christ, the Son of God, was begotten from God, and thus created. The
Son had a beginning before which he did not exist. In a letter to
Eusebius, Bishop of Nicomedia, Arius argued that the Son “was
fully God, only-begotten, unchangeable” while at the same time
he argued that “before he was begotten or created . . . he did
not exist.”
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
The President’s Report 2008
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
June 30, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
This
edition of the ACT 3 Weekly is different. Usually I write a
biblical or theological commentary on some aspect of the Church’s
faith, life, or mission. This week I want to tell you about ACT 3.
Who are we? What do we do and why do we do it? What are my dreams and
hopes for the future of this unique mission?
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Rightly Recognizing God as Trinity, Part 1
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
June 23, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
In
the full flush of the overwhelming joy of the resurrection of Jesus,
and the coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, the earliest
Christians were profoundly constrained to come to grips with the
question: “Who is God?” A passage like 1 John 1:1–7
made it clear to them that they had seen the living and true God in
Jesus Christ. Here divine revelation (“that which was from the
beginning . . . the Word of life”) was linked with human
sensory perception (“heard, seen, looked at, touched”),
thus revealing that the apostolic witness was to a person who had two
natures, one divine and the other human.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
The Proper Basis for True Christian Faith
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
June 16, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
True
Christian faith is distinctly rooted in the settled conviction that
the one, unique God is revealed to us as triune, existing as Father,
Son and Holy Spirit. The word triune points to the historic but
mysterious Christian belief that God is revealed, and known, as both
three and one. No truth has prompted more debate, more scandal and
more misunderstanding. And no truth is more important to the renewal
of Christian faith in our time.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Recovering Real Wisdom in an Age Gone Mad
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
June 9, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
James
M. Houston writes: “The reality of Christ as Creator-Redeemer
makes little or no sense to our society because the world is no
longer seen as creation” (I Believe in the Creator,
148). The structure of Western life is built on the Creator/creature
distinction, a distinction that allows us to understand that we are
vice-regents made in the image of God, the designer. But we have
rejected the roots of the West, the very roots which nourished art,
music, literature and freedom for centuries. The result is that our
age has gone mad, that is, “wildly disordered or insane”.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Learning to Live Wisely
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
June 2, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
Can
there be any serious question that ours is an age preoccupied with
technology? We want to know, almost more than anything else its
seems, “What works?” Thus we no longer marvel at the
question: “What is wise?” Or, “How do we get real
wisdom in the first place?” We marvel at our newest gadgets
like iPods and iPhones, while we pass by the holy and the divine with
little or no abiding interest. This way of living so permeates our
culture that we rarely see how much it is a routine part of our daily
lives. But it is there with us, influencing all we do and say, night
and day. Simply put, we have come to value our technicians, not our
sages. And this spirit has captured the Church in a deep way, making
it crave techne much more than pneuma, the Spirit’s
power. Is there a solution?
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
The Dangers Inherent in Getting Divine Providence Wrong
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
May 26, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
We
began, a few weeks ago, to consider the way in which divine
providence can provide a gentle and powerful reminder in this
election year that the nation is in God’s hands. This
confidence can embolden Christians to live righteous and godly lives
in times when terrorism and fear grip many of us. We then looked at
the definition of the doctrine of providence and how theologians have
constructed this definition over the last twenty centuries. Finally,
I would like to show some of the dangers that are inherent in getting
this truth “by the wrong end of the stick.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Constructing a Theology of Divine Providence
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
May 19, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
At
times well-intentioned Christians treat theology as if it were an
exact and precise science through which they can construct a logical
and humanly reasonable system of thought. They then conclude that
this reasonable system parallels God’s revelation in virtually
perfect ways. This is not only an abuse of the task of good theology
but it leads to human pride, in both theologians and those who
embrace this type of theology. Individuals find a “system”
they can believe and then rely upon the logical proofs and arguments
related to this system to make the case that their system is
tantamount to God’s Word. This has been particularly true with
regard to how the Church has tried to understand and confess the
doctrine of divine providence.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
The Providence of God
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
May 12, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
Last
week I tried to show how we can face the future without fear
because the Word of God plainly says: “Heaven rules”
(Daniel 4:26). This whole subject is what we call, in theological
language, the doctrine of providence. My spiritual life is deeply
rooted in this doctrine and has been for as long as I can remember.
But the longer I ponder it the deeper it takes me and the more facets
I see in the truth.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
24: Some Reflections on Heaven's Rule Prompted by a Television Series
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
May 5, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
I
have previously written that I went through the first five seasons of
the Fox television series 24 last year. I actually did it
rather quickly, which is a sure sign of addiction at some level. (I
dare you to sit and watch one or two episodes of 24 and not
watch another and then another if you have the time to do it.) Anyone
who watches the show will confess to a certain level of "addiction"
once you get started. I was forewarned, but now so are you. It is a
combination of (bits of) reality and (a lot of) fantasy that makes
for gripping drama and an emotional thrill ride.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Equipping Lives for the Ministry of the Gospel, Part 3
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
April 28, 2008
by John H. Armstrong
|
 |
In
the past two ACT 3 Weekly articles I laid out several of the points I
shared with a seminary class in Florida in March. I was asked to
contribute from my own experience to the preparation of these
students in a divinity school setting. In this third and final
installment of my three-part series, I add these further points that
I made to the seminary class in Florida.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Equipping Lives for the Ministry of the Gospel, Part 2
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|